← The Array

A borrowed 11.4 GWdc quarter and a repriced BOM

September 16, 2026 · trade duties, market data, O&M

The number every sales deck will quote until December is 11.4 GWdc, and almost all of the growth inside it was borrowed from 2027. Utility-scale put up 9.6 GWdc in Q2, up 61% year on year, because developers sprinted to get steel in the ground against the safe-harbour clock. Residential did 995 MWdc, down 12%. Community solar did 231 MWdc, down 14%. The two segments that employ the most people per megawatt went backwards in the biggest quarter the US market has ever recorded.

In the same week, the other half of the arithmetic moved. Commerce finalised triple-digit dumping and subsidy margins on the three countries that quietly replaced Southeast Asia on your bill of materials, and those duties land on top of a module price floor that starts on 4 December. The build rate is pulled forward. The BOM is not.

11.4 GWdc, and one segment is carrying all of it

SEIA and Wood Mackenzie published the Q2 2026 edition of US Solar Market Insight on 10 September. Total installations were 11.4 GWdc, up 45% on Q2 2025, and Texas led with 3.44 GW, followed by Arizona at 1.76 GW and Florida at 1.61 GW. The segment split is where the job market actually lives:

  • Utility-scale: 9.6 GWdc, up 61% year on year and up 56% on Q1.
  • Commercial: 638 MWdc, up 11% year on year and up 27% on Q1 — the quiet good news.
  • Residential: 995 MWdc, down 12% year on year.
  • Community solar: 231 MWdc, down 14% year on year.

Read that as a scheduling artefact, not a recovery. Solar Power World's write-up of the same report attributes the utility-scale spike to developers racing projects into service ahead of the July 2026 safe-harbour deadline for credit eligibility. Work that was going to happen in 2027 happened in Q2 instead. If you are a utility-scale foreman or a travelling mechanical crew, your 2026 looked busy for a reason that does not repeat.

"Robust project pipelines and the build out of safe-harbored capacity will sustain roughly 44 GW of annual capacity through 2031," said Caitlin Connelly, senior analyst at Wood Mackenzie, in the report's release.

That forecast is a run-rate, not a ramp. A market that holds near its current annual volume for five years is a market where headcount is won from competitors rather than from growth — which is roughly what the last two years of consolidation have looked like. Residential's 995 MWdc is simply what the segment looks like without a homeowner credit behind it, and the analysts have it returning to growth in 2027 rather than this year.

Commerce finalises the duties, and they stack on the December floor

On 11 September the Department of Commerce issued final affirmative dumping and subsidy determinations on crystalline silicon cells and modules from India, Indonesia and Laos. Combined margins, as reported by pv magazine USA, run to roughly 234% for India, 178% for Indonesia and 103% for Laos. Solar Power World's breakdown puts the Indian antidumping rate at 123.04% with a 126.09% countervailing rate applied to all exporters, and separates the Indonesian and Laotian respondents by company — Blue Sky Solar at 94.36% AD with a 173.70% CVD rate, Solarspace at 65.43% AD and 82.03% CVD, Vietnam Sunergy at 65.43% AD and 153.67% CVD.

Nothing is collected yet. The US International Trade Commission — the Commission, not the 48E credit — votes on final injury on 14 October, and the orders only issue on an affirmative finding. The petition came from the Alliance for American Solar Manufacturing and Trade, whose members include First Solar, Mission Solar, Qcells and Talon PV, and counsel Tim Brightbill of Wiley called the determinations "an essential step toward enforcing our trade laws."

The procurement consequence is the stacking. These duties sit on top of the Section 232 remedy, which takes effect at 12:01 Eastern on 4 December and sets a minimum import price — a floor below which duties apply, not a tariff rate — of $0.38/Wdc on modules, $0.22/Wdc on cells, $21/kg on polysilicon and $100/kg on ingots and wafers, plus a 15% ad valorem layer. Anza Renewables benchmarked the gap on 5 August: its median imported module sat at 27.1¢/Wdc, so the floor is about 40% above where the market actually cleared. Domestic assembly with imported cells was 30¢/Wdc and goes to roughly 43¢/Wdc; domestic assembly using US cells and imported wafers was 47¢/Wdc and lands somewhere between 56 and 62¢/Wdc.

If you are holding a signed fixed-price EPC contract priced off a 27¢/Wdc module, find out this week which side of the line your supply sits on. Anza reads the proclamation as exempting suppliers under a fixed-term contract with a buyer signed before 6 August 2026, with capped treatment for certain treaty partners and a Commerce-approved onshoring pathway that grants duty relief during construction. Those carve-outs are where the arguments will be, and the proclamation as reported also leaves the US Trade Representative room to negotiate country arrangements that move the goalposts again. Check the current Federal Register notice and CBP's entry guidance before you reprice anything — the rate that matters is the one collected at the port, not the one in the press release.

Array Technologies opens a 216,000 sq ft plant in Albuquerque and hires about 300

Array Technologies — the tracker manufacturer, not the array on your rack — opened its largest factory in Albuquerque on 9 September. It is 216,000 square feet, roughly three times the site it replaces, cost about $50 million, and brings in-house a set of tracker and racking components the company previously bought outside. Several of those components qualify for the 45X advanced manufacturing production credit. Public money is in it: $2.5 million from New Mexico's Local Economic Development Act job-creation fund, $250,000 each from the city of Albuquerque and Bernalillo County, and a partial property-tax abatement via an industrial revenue bond.

The headcount is roughly 300, and the roles are worth reading closely if you are a PV hand thinking about getting off the road: stamping press operators, tooling and die technicians, process engineers, plus design, customer service and assembly. That is a metal-fabrication job description wearing a solar badge. It pays differently from per-diem field work, it does not travel, and it is the kind of position that survives a soft install quarter because it is tied to a manufacturing credit rather than to an installation deadline. CEO Kevin Hostetler framed it as "our continued belief in American solar manufacturing"; more usefully, it is 300 openings in a state where utility-scale work is already dense.

The tracker patent fight is now about how your site stows for hail

On 9 September GameChange Solar filed suit against Nextpower in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting US Patent 12,449,161 over high-tilt wind and hail stow — the technique of rotating rows to roughly 60–80° from horizontal once wind crosses about 70 mph so the array presents less surface to the load. GameChange names the NX Horizon with Hail Pro product. It is a countersuit: Nextpower sued first on 1 June over three patents covering self-powered tracker hardware and control software. Trial is calendared for August 2028.

Two things matter on site. First, stow strategy has stopped being a spec-sheet footnote and become contested intellectual property, which means owner's engineers and independent engineers will start asking how a given tracker achieves high-tilt stow and whether that method is encumbered. Second, if you are an O&M tech or a site supervisor, the operative question is unchanged and unglamorous: does the stow actually fire, and does anyone verify it between storms? A hail claim turns on whether the array reached commanded position, and that is a commissioning and monitoring record, not a lawsuit.

Cheap to build, expensive to run — and 38% of the gap is assumptions

Vish Kulkarni, associate manager of estimation at Madison Energy Infrastructure, published an op-ed on 10 September that deserves a read from anyone quoting BESS scopes. His argument: LFP container prices have fallen from $300–400/kWh in the early 2010s to $180–250/kWh by 2023, utility-scale CapEx now runs around $125/kWh, and none of that tells you what the asset costs to own. Equipment is 65–75% of capital; site and infrastructure work is the other 25–35%.

The number to keep is his worked example: two otherwise identical 20 MW projects come out 38% apart on levelised cost of storage — $206/MWh against $285/MWh — purely on operating assumptions. He cites degradation at 1–2.5% per year, and notes that at 2% a system reaches 65% of nameplate after 20 years, which is an augmentation budget nobody prices at bid. For context on the spread, he puts the EIA's model at $126/MWh and Lazard's range at $210–292/MWh.

For crews, this is the argument that funds O&M headcount. Storage attach is where residential and C&I labour has been migrating, and the case for a properly staffed service contract has never rested on the install margin — it rests on cycling, thermal management and augmentation over twenty years. An estimator who can defend an availability guarantee with numbers like these is worth more than one who can only price the container.

Delaware ran four community solar projects through a permitting accelerator

The Delaware Public Service Commission advanced four community solar projects totalling more than 16 MW — the announcement does not state a dc or ac basis — in Seaford, Townsend and Clayton, representing more than $73 million of investment and an estimated 10–15% bill reduction for over 16,000 households. They went through JobsFirst, Governor Matt Meyer's permitting accelerator, which coordinates state agency reviews on shared timelines behind a single point of contact.

Set that against community solar's 231 MWdc national quarter, down 14%. The segment's problem has rarely been demand for subscriptions; it is the months a project sits between award and permission to operate while agency reviews run in series. A single-point-of-contact review with a published clock is the kind of unglamorous fix that changes a developer's carrying cost and, downstream, whether a small EPC can keep a crew badged between jobs. Worth watching whether other states with stalled community solar programmes copy the mechanism rather than the incentive.

The through-line this week is that the work is moving from installing modules to making, litigating over and maintaining them. Utility-scale hiring rode a deadline that has passed; the durable openings are in fabrication, in service contracts and in the O&M scopes that outlast a build. If that is the direction you are steering, the current openings are sorted by segment for exactly this reason.

Looking for your next role in solar?

Browse open jobs